Download Antony and Cleopatra: New Critical Essays (Shakespeare by Sara Munson Deats PDF
By Sara Munson Deats
Complementing different volumes within the Shakespeare feedback sequence, this choice of twenty unique essays will extend the serious contexts within which Antony and Cleopatra could be loved as either literature and theater. The essays will hide a large spectrum of subject matters and make the most of a range of scholarly methodologies, together with textual and performance-oriented ways, intertextual reports, in addition to feminist, psychoanalytical, Marxist, and postcolonial inquiries. the quantity also will characteristic an intensive creation by way of the editor surveying the under-examined functionality heritage and significant trends/legacy of this complicated play. individuals comprise favourite Shakespeare students David Bevington, Dympna Callaghan, Leeds Barroll, David Fuller, Dorothea Kehler, and Linda Woodbridge.
Read or Download Antony and Cleopatra: New Critical Essays (Shakespeare Criticism) PDF
Best renaissance books
Shakespeare and the character of girls , first released in 1975, inaugurated a brand new wave of feminist scholarship. It claimed that Shakespeare's performs provided a sustained critique of inherited male brooding about ladies, theological, literary and social. The ebook argued that the presence of the boy actor in Shakespeare's theatre created an knowledge of gender as functionality.
No topic looms better over the historic panorama of medieval Spain than that of the reconquista, the speedy enlargement of the ability of the Christian kingdoms into the Muslim-populated lands of southern Iberia, which created a vast frontier sector that for 2 centuries remained a zone of battle and peril.
- Domestic Misconduct in the Novels of Defoe, Richardson, and Fielding
- Music, Authorship, and the Book in the First Century of Print
- Elizabethan England (Costume and Fashion Source Books)
- The Stoic Origins of Erasmus’ Philosophy of Christ
- Morgante/Opere minori
Additional info for Antony and Cleopatra: New Critical Essays (Shakespeare Criticism)
Yet many commentators berate her for vacillating, adducing the scene in which her treasurer Seleucus accuses her of withholding money and other assets from Caesar as proof that she is not resolute for death and is keeping all options open. Thus, the Seleucus episode has become a central crux of the play and because of its manifest ambiguities is often cut in performance. In response to these skeptics, commentators since Adolf Stahr (1864) have asserted that in Shakespeare’s play, as in Plutarch, the episode of the concealed treasure is a ruse, orchestrated by Cleopatra and rehearsed with Seleucus, devised to gull Caesar into believing that Cleopatra desires to live, thus making him less vigilant in his guard; moreover, the subterfuge works perfectly, and Caesar is “unpolicied” (qtd.
H. Case (1906), although admiring Antony’s magnanimity, criticizes Antony’s treacherous and cold-blooded treatment of Octavia, calling into question the commonplace that Shakespeare changed his sources to civilize the portrait of Antony inherited from Plutarch. Mythic exegetes have had a heyday with Antony, identifying in this colossal figure an avatar of Hercules, Mars, Bacchus/Dionysus, and even Osiris. Moreover, the multiple, often contradictory associations of these mythic deities enhance the contrariety of Antony’s paradoxical image.
Denton Snider (1876) was one of the ﬁrst critics to identify Octavius as the “true Roman” and ideal ruler, a view espoused by Phillips (1940) who analyzes Octavius, Lepidus, Pompey, and Antony against traditional standards of leadership, concluding that only Octavius displays the capabilities of the successful leader, which he deﬁnes as reason ruling passion, sobriety, temperance, consistency, and, surprisingly—Antony’s legendary virtue—magnanimity. Battenhouse (1969) expands the contrast between the temperate Octavius and the intemperate Antony, a critical position supported more recently by Christopher Wortham (1995), who presents Octavius as displaying “a kind of temperance that wins him the ﬁeld and prepares him for empire” (27).